Bears Defense Exposed: Beating the Cover-2


Matt Bowen is bringing it at the National Football Post.  As a former player, he offers the type of X’s and O’s insight that helps hard core fans get an even better view of what’s going on between the white lines on Sundays.  A couple of weeks ago, he told us all about the Cover-2 defense.  I am happy to ride his coattails and put a little extra Bears spin on his analysis.

In the latest entry in his Inside the Playbook series, Bowen offers some insight on how to beat the Cover-2 defense.   As Bears fans, we had a front row seat to this as time and again, the defense was picked apart.  Let’s see what Bowen describes as the keys to beating Lovie’s favorite scheme.

First Matt gives us the 7/FLAT route.  Check out the alignment and Bowen’s breakdown after the jump.

Let’s start with the 7/Flat. I put the offense in “Posse” or “311” personnel (3 WR, 1 TE, 1 RB) against the basic Nickel package on defense (5 DB, 2 LB, 4 DL), where the nickel back replaces the Sam linebacker. The offense is in a 2×2 alignment with the running back in the “dot” alignment behind the QB.

7/FLAT route (Image courtesy of National Football Post)

The key to beating the Tampa 2 with this scheme is the “7” (or the Flag Route). Both No.1’s (“X” and “Z”) take a hard inside release, stem to a vertical alignment and break their route between 12-15 yards towards the corner of the field. The objective here is simple: find the hole between the deep half safety and the corner who is sinking to provide a cushion—or time—for the safety to get over the top of the WR. As you can see, the highlighted yellow box is the target for the QB, and as always, safeties in Tampa 2 have to be alert for the No.1 WR to use an inside release to set up the “7” and then break to the post.

The rest of the route looks simple, but again, it is designed to put more pressure on the safeties. Both No.2’s (“Y” and “W”) run flat routes that act as a second read for the QB and as bait for the corners. From an offensive perspective, the QB wants the corners to react up to the flat, opening the hole in front of the safeties. If the corner sinks—as taught—the QB will throw to the flat, and if the corner squats on the flat route, then the QB will look to beat the defense by dropping the ball over the corner to the No.1 WR.

The RB scans for protection and then leaks out as a check down option. The defense will allow the QB to dump the ball off to the middle of the field, react, run to the ball and make a tackle.

By far, the 7/Flat forces the defense to play the technique of the Tampa 2 more than any other offensive scheme.

Does this seem familiar?  Receivers settling into the little nooks and crannies of the defense to pick us apart up and down the field.

Here’s the next route pattern that Bowen labels as a Cover-2 buster:

The second route I want to break down today is the “999,” which looks and acts the same as running 4 Verticals—only the TE is the player to watch. Another way to beat Tampa 2 and another way to exploit this defense by taking advantage of the Mike Backer and the two deep half safeties.

We have the same personnel on the field; expect that the offense is set in a 3×1 alignment. The key to this route in the release by the No.1s (“X” and “Z”). Both WRs want to take a hard outside release to stretch the safeties and force them to widen from their landmarks (top of the numbers), which will open up the inside vertical seams. By doing this, the offense will have more room to work the middle of the field without the safeties being able to react and make a play on the football—all because of the release.

No.2 to the strong (or closed side), the “W,” will release inside on the nickel and then stem his route to get vertical, putting pressure on the Mike Backer—who has to run with any inside vertical route. However, the key aspect to the “999” is the TE or the “Y.” The TE is the No.3 receiver to the closed side. He essentially becomes the fourth vertical in this scheme, except that he stems his route at a deep angle—becoming the No.2 receiver to the weak side (or open side) at the end of the route.

Why do this? All because of the Mike. In this scheme, the offense is running two verticals at the Mike (“W” and “Y”) and forcing the linebacker to open to the closed side, get to his drop and read the eyes of the QB. A tough situation for even the most athletic player at the position. Especially with the safeties now playing wider due to the release of the No.1 WRs.

As we saw above, the RB will check release and the QB will dump the ball if he doesn’t have one of the vertical routes open down the field.

If there’s reason for optimism, it’s the fact that Urlacher is coming back healthy, since so much of this defense relies on the Mike linebacker to cover so much ground.  As admirably as Hillenmeyer and company did filling in last season, there’s only one #54.  Getting Chris Harris back in the fold will help get the safeties in the right spots too.   As Bowen points out repeatedly, the coverages in this scheme rely heavily on the middle linebacker and safeties.

Last season, the Bears pretty much sucked in 3rd and long situations, as ESPN NFC North blogger Kevin Seifert so astutely points out – he’s a freaking genius – and plays like those listed above were a huge part of that.  Fix this Lovie and Rod and maybe – just maybe – you’ll save our season.

BEAR DOWN!!!

Be sure to keep up with Bear Goggles On wherever you go, with our iPhone and Droid apps.   They’re FREE!  Check em out!

Next Bears Game View full schedule »
Thursday, Aug 2828 Aug8:00at Cleveland BrownsBuy Tickets
Dick's Sporting Goods presents "Hell Week":

Tags: Beating The Cover-2 Cover 2 Matt Bowen National Football Post

  • City

    Great Post Boomer!

    A couple questions: how often do the Bears actually use the Cover-2? Meaning, how often do they mix it up with man-to-man and other zone defenses? What do defenses like the Steelers (or other 3-4) teams do that’s different?

  • Windy Cynic

    Why are we stuck in Lovies mud (retreat 2)?

    Any accurate qb that has timing routes at his disposal will pick us apart.

    Everyone plays a version of this defense in “SITUATIONS”, but as a base defense it gives too much.

    Hey Boomer, why hasn’t any team copied the 46 we used to play in Ryan era? Maybe it’s referred to differently now, but it’s as if it disappeared when this ineffective d scheme we employ won’t die.

    Thanks boom

  • Bill

    Like WC says above, everyone uses the cover-2 sometimes, in certain situations… but as a base d, it’s way too exploitable and everyone knows how… even a fan blog.

    Time to get a bit more creative lovie you f*cktard.

  • Pingback: National Football Post’s Matt Bowen Breaks Down Bears Camp | Bear Goggles On | A Chicago Bears Blog