Comments on: Bears Have a Home Field Disadvantage

By: drhad

drhad — Wed, 15 Dec 2010 06:19:16 +0000

The Bears, have a deasises, its simply put LovieSmithIsm. He has no killer instinct. Nor do the Bears. He is in with this prevent defense called a cover two, Tampa two. Who gives a flip. It prevents the bears from doing a New England, on the other team. Lovie get off your deer in the headlights ASS, and let the Bears be what we expect. Monsters! I have had the unfortunate circumstance of living in Nebraska for the last 7 years, so I have not seen alot of Bears games, have pity on me please. I now am in Myrtle Beach SC second thought no potty needed. This year I got to see almost all Bears games, this year. Including the Philly game while on the drive through at my daughters in Chicago. The group I was with all had the same type of feeling. Lovie has got to GO. They are With few exceptions what a bunch of lovies (pansies). Whats really bad about this is the dunderheads that are Bears upper management will see a winning record, and a first round knockout of the playoffs as progress. NOT! Since Lovie is so fond of using other peoples defenses, lets use the way-back machine Mr. Sherman and bring back Buddy Ryan’s 46 D. There are so few coaches with a killer instinct it will be tough but it can be done. For the Bears to have FEAR about playing in Bear weather, whats next we will be talking about the Mians and the end of the world in 2012. Professor Martz may have it But I don’t think so.
So lets try this everyone, its an old school bit. Whoohao Lovie has got to go. It sure would be nice to sing we are the Champions again.
BE foe now Dr Had

By: Bears Have a Home Field Disadvantage | Bear Goggles On | A Chicago … | The Knowledge Blog – Dominima

Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:47:26 +0000

[...] Continue reading Tags: after-the-blizzard, bears, blizzard, brady, cutler, lack, patriots, the-blizzard, vaunted-defenseBookmark the permalink. ← Pursuing an Education and Career in Marketing and Sales | Kids and … Med School Keywords | Kids and Teens which College or University … → © 2010 The Knowledge Blog – Dominima var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-20235547-1']); _gaq.push(['_setDomainName', '.dominima.net']); (function() { var ga = document.createElement('script'); ga.type = 'text/javascript'; ga.async = true; ga.src = ('https:' == document.location.protocol ? 'https://ssl' : 'http://www&#39 + '.google-analytics.com/ga.js'; var s = document.getElementsByTagName('script')[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(ga, s); })(); [...]

By: Boomer

Boomer — Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:48:11 +0000

From what I’ve heard, it’s actually the Bears that are holding it up. The Chicago Park District proposed it to the Bears – since it costs $500k to re-sod – but the Bears want more data on injuries and player safety of the latest artificial turf before they allow it. Supposedly injury rate is higher on turf. I’ll see if I can dig up some more info for ya.

By: DeCon

DeCon — Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:23:49 +0000

Boomer…you are a man in the know…what the hell is the hold up with just putting turf in??? As blasphemous as that might be, if we are stuck with Lovie an Co. for the forseeable future, you’d think adding turf would be a no brainer.

By: Phil

Phil — Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:55:27 +0000

Another great article Boomer. Don’t forget about Seattle this year, and the Falcons last year. The Cover/Tampa 2 really worked well in those games as well.