<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chicago Bears Week 13 Report Card</title>
	<atom:link href="http://beargoggleson.com/2011/12/05/chicago-bears-week-13-report-card/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://beargoggleson.com/2011/12/05/chicago-bears-week-13-report-card/</link>
	<description>A Chicago Bears Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Dec 2012 14:16:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chicago Irish</title>
		<link>http://beargoggleson.com/2011/12/05/chicago-bears-week-13-report-card/comment-page-1/#comment-1410559</link>
		<dc:creator>Chicago Irish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Dec 2011 00:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beargoggleson.com/?p=14434#comment-1410559</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll spare everyone my typical belief of the Bears&#039; coaching staff lacking the ability to coach; and the organization&#039;s inability to draft and evaluate talent.  But the real problem (IMO) is the Bears rely too heavily on winning games based on their defense and ST.  Don&#039;t get me wrong, both are important.  But if the D doesn&#039;t get 3+ turnovers and Hester doesn&#039;t run one back, then we scramble to put points on the board.  I don&#039;t know...maybe this doesn&#039;t make sense to anyone else.  I&#039;m just still pissed they pissed the bed against the Chiefs.  I&#039;m mean, for God&#039;s sake...3 damn points against the Chiefs.  That&#039;s all we got...3 damn points!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll spare everyone my typical belief of the Bears&#8217; coaching staff lacking the ability to coach; and the organization&#8217;s inability to draft and evaluate talent.  But the real problem (IMO) is the Bears rely too heavily on winning games based on their defense and ST.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong, both are important.  But if the D doesn&#8217;t get 3+ turnovers and Hester doesn&#8217;t run one back, then we scramble to put points on the board.  I don&#8217;t know&#8230;maybe this doesn&#8217;t make sense to anyone else.  I&#8217;m just still pissed they pissed the bed against the Chiefs.  I&#8217;m mean, for God&#8217;s sake&#8230;3 damn points against the Chiefs.  That&#8217;s all we got&#8230;3 damn points!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chicago Irish</title>
		<link>http://beargoggleson.com/2011/12/05/chicago-bears-week-13-report-card/comment-page-1/#comment-9408</link>
		<dc:creator>Chicago Irish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 23:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beargoggleson.com/?p=14434#comment-9408</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll spare everyone my typical belief of the Bears&#039; coaching staff lacking the ability to coach; and the organization&#039;s inability to draft and evaluate talent.  But the real problem (IMO) is the Bears rely too heavily on winning games based on their defense and ST.  Don&#039;t get me wrong, both are important.  But if the D doesn&#039;t get 3+ turnovers and Hester doesn&#039;t run one back, then we scramble to put points on the board.  I don&#039;t know...maybe this doesn&#039;t make sense to anyone else.  I&#039;m just still pissed they pissed the bed against the Chiefs.  I&#039;m mean, for God&#039;s sake...3 damn points against the Chiefs.  That&#039;s all we got...3 damn points!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll spare everyone my typical belief of the Bears&#8217; coaching staff lacking the ability to coach; and the organization&#8217;s inability to draft and evaluate talent.  But the real problem (IMO) is the Bears rely too heavily on winning games based on their defense and ST.  Don&#8217;t get me wrong, both are important.  But if the D doesn&#8217;t get 3+ turnovers and Hester doesn&#8217;t run one back, then we scramble to put points on the board.  I don&#8217;t know&#8230;maybe this doesn&#8217;t make sense to anyone else.  I&#8217;m just still pissed they pissed the bed against the Chiefs.  I&#8217;m mean, for God&#8217;s sake&#8230;3 damn points against the Chiefs.  That&#8217;s all we got&#8230;3 damn points!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: City</title>
		<link>http://beargoggleson.com/2011/12/05/chicago-bears-week-13-report-card/comment-page-1/#comment-1410555</link>
		<dc:creator>City</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 00:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beargoggleson.com/?p=14434#comment-1410555</guid>
		<description>C- for Martz is utterly wrong. This is the second game (and loss) in a row, where he had the opportunity to push the game forward with a field goal and win a low-scoring game, but instead he chose a pass play and failed. Fourth and 1 yard and he put the ball in his &quot;rookie&quot; QB&#039;s hands and not his all-pro-to-be runningback. Against the chiefs, if the offense can&#039;t get one yard on a run play then they don&#039;t deserve the win, but to put that responsibility on Caleb is asinine. AND, the fact that the playcalling was &quot;balanced&quot; also means that he was relying on Caleb too much. AND, even though we all know that the Bears wanted to run the ball, Martz only called ONE play-action pass IN TWO GAMES! That&#039;s right, every pass Caleb called was a straight drop-back. NO! Let&#039;s not help the rookie out by SOME type of fake. Nope, let&#039;s just run em back and let the D-line shift into pass-rush mode. Not one swing pass to an RB or FB. Not one screen this week either. I swear to god, if they don&#039;t fire Martz on the off-season, I&#039;m giving up the Bears next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C- for Martz is utterly wrong. This is the second game (and loss) in a row, where he had the opportunity to push the game forward with a field goal and win a low-scoring game, but instead he chose a pass play and failed. Fourth and 1 yard and he put the ball in his &#8220;rookie&#8221; QB&#8217;s hands and not his all-pro-to-be runningback. Against the chiefs, if the offense can&#8217;t get one yard on a run play then they don&#8217;t deserve the win, but to put that responsibility on Caleb is asinine. AND, the fact that the playcalling was &#8220;balanced&#8221; also means that he was relying on Caleb too much. AND, even though we all know that the Bears wanted to run the ball, Martz only called ONE play-action pass IN TWO GAMES! That&#8217;s right, every pass Caleb called was a straight drop-back. NO! Let&#8217;s not help the rookie out by SOME type of fake. Nope, let&#8217;s just run em back and let the D-line shift into pass-rush mode. Not one swing pass to an RB or FB. Not one screen this week either. I swear to god, if they don&#8217;t fire Martz on the off-season, I&#8217;m giving up the Bears next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: City</title>
		<link>http://beargoggleson.com/2011/12/05/chicago-bears-week-13-report-card/comment-page-1/#comment-9402</link>
		<dc:creator>City</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 23:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beargoggleson.com/?p=14434#comment-9402</guid>
		<description>C- for Martz is utterly wrong. This is the second game (and loss) in a row, where he had the opportunity to push the game forward with a field goal and win a low-scoring game, but instead he chose a pass play and failed. Fourth and 1 yard and he put the ball in his &quot;rookie&quot; QB&#039;s hands and not his all-pro-to-be runningback. Against the chiefs, if the offense can&#039;t get one yard on a run play then they don&#039;t deserve the win, but to put that responsibility on Caleb is asinine. AND, the fact that the playcalling was &quot;balanced&quot; also means that he was relying on Caleb too much. AND, even though we all know that the Bears wanted to run the ball, Martz only called ONE play-action pass IN TWO GAMES! That&#039;s right, every pass Caleb called was a straight drop-back. NO! Let&#039;s not help the rookie out by SOME type of fake. Nope, let&#039;s just run em back and let the D-line shift into pass-rush mode. Not one swing pass to an RB or FB. Not one screen this week either. I swear to god, if they don&#039;t fire Martz on the off-season, I&#039;m giving up the Bears next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C- for Martz is utterly wrong. This is the second game (and loss) in a row, where he had the opportunity to push the game forward with a field goal and win a low-scoring game, but instead he chose a pass play and failed. Fourth and 1 yard and he put the ball in his &#8220;rookie&#8221; QB&#8217;s hands and not his all-pro-to-be runningback. Against the chiefs, if the offense can&#8217;t get one yard on a run play then they don&#8217;t deserve the win, but to put that responsibility on Caleb is asinine. AND, the fact that the playcalling was &#8220;balanced&#8221; also means that he was relying on Caleb too much. AND, even though we all know that the Bears wanted to run the ball, Martz only called ONE play-action pass IN TWO GAMES! That&#8217;s right, every pass Caleb called was a straight drop-back. NO! Let&#8217;s not help the rookie out by SOME type of fake. Nope, let&#8217;s just run em back and let the D-line shift into pass-rush mode. Not one swing pass to an RB or FB. Not one screen this week either. I swear to god, if they don&#8217;t fire Martz on the off-season, I&#8217;m giving up the Bears next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr.Pickles</title>
		<link>http://beargoggleson.com/2011/12/05/chicago-bears-week-13-report-card/comment-page-1/#comment-1410554</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr.Pickles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 20:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beargoggleson.com/?p=14434#comment-1410554</guid>
		<description>This turned out to be the only game all year that I wasn&#039;t able to follow live in any way, shape, or form.  Initially I was disappointed when I realized this, now I definitely think it was for the best.  I had faith in Hanie, now I&#039;m ready to start smashing the panic button.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This turned out to be the only game all year that I wasn&#8217;t able to follow live in any way, shape, or form.  Initially I was disappointed when I realized this, now I definitely think it was for the best.  I had faith in Hanie, now I&#8217;m ready to start smashing the panic button.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr.Pickles</title>
		<link>http://beargoggleson.com/2011/12/05/chicago-bears-week-13-report-card/comment-page-1/#comment-9401</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr.Pickles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Dec 2011 19:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beargoggleson.com/?p=14434#comment-9401</guid>
		<description>This turned out to be the only game all year that I wasn&#039;t able to follow live in any way, shape, or form.  Initially I was disappointed when I realized this, now I definitely think it was for the best.  I had faith in Hanie, now I&#039;m ready to start smashing the panic button.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This turned out to be the only game all year that I wasn&#8217;t able to follow live in any way, shape, or form.  Initially I was disappointed when I realized this, now I definitely think it was for the best.  I had faith in Hanie, now I&#8217;m ready to start smashing the panic button.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 17/26 queries in 0.077 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 363/377 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.fansided.com

 Served from: beargoggleson.com @ 2013-05-24 00:43:00 by W3 Total Cache -->