<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bear Goggles On &#187; against the spread</title>
	<atom:link href="http://beargoggleson.com/tag/against-the-spread/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://beargoggleson.com</link>
	<description>A Chicago Bears Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 06:29:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Bart&#8217;s Best &#8211; Week 10 Top Plays</title>
		<link>http://beargoggleson.com/2009/11/13/barts-best-week-10-top-plays/</link>
		<comments>http://beargoggleson.com/2009/11/13/barts-best-week-10-top-plays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 02:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boomer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Top Plays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[against the spread]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[baltimore ravens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chicago bears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cleveland Browns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Denver Broncos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New Orleans Saints]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nfl betting predictions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St. Louis Rams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Redskins]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beargoggleson.com/?p=3747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>(Cue the music)  &#8220;Mama said they&#8217;ll be weeks like this, they&#8217;ll be weeks like this Mama said (Mama said, Mama said).&#8221;  Ouch!  Okay, no more picking 5 games (last week &#8211; 1-4).  I knew last week when I did that there was an uneasy vibe in the air.  A couple of thoughts:  Bears are bad [...]</p><p><a href="http://beargoggleson.com/2009/11/13/barts-best-week-10-top-plays/">Bart&#8217;s Best &#8211; Week 10 Top Plays</a> - <a href="http://beargoggleson.com">Bear Goggles On</a> - <a href="http://beargoggleson.com">Bear Goggles On - A Chicago Bears Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more.</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Cue the music)  &#8220;Mama said they&#8217;ll be weeks like this, they&#8217;ll be weeks like this Mama said (Mama said, Mama said).&#8221;  Ouch!  Okay, no more picking 5 games (last week &#8211; 1-4).  I knew last week when I did that there was an uneasy vibe in the air.  A couple of thoughts:  <strong>Bears </strong>are bad and they proved it again last night.  I have to stop picking on <strong>Dallas </strong>- that was a solid win in <strong>Philly</strong>, although I was under the impression that Westbrook was going to play &#8211; he is a difference-maker.  I guess <strong>New Orleans</strong> can&#8217;t win every week by double-digits&#8230;..but they will this week.  On to Week 11:</p>
<p><strong>New Orleans </strong><strong> -13.5</strong><strong> at Rams</strong> &#8211; A Dome is a Dome is a Dome.  The spread is under the dreaded 14 because it is an away game and people got burned by picking New Orleans last week against Carolina (i.e. Me).  Don&#8217;t fear the big points this week &#8211; keep pounding New Orleans.  It will pan out in the long run.</p>
<p><strong>Broncos -3.5 at Redskins</strong> Having a hard time figuring this one out and that usually scares me away from a game.  The Broncos are coming off two losses and it is time to right the ship.  Playing a woefully awful team is the way to do it.  I&#8217;m not letting that hook (.5) scare me away on this one.</p>
<p><strong>Ravens</strong><strong> -10.5</strong><strong> at Browns</strong> Typically would stay away from a &#8220;bad blood&#8221; rivalry, but this time around, the scales are too heavily tipped Baltimore&#8217;s way.  For crying out loud, the Bears beat Cleveland by 24 &#8211; you don&#8217;t think that Baltimore&#8217;s Defense will shut down the Brownies?  Think of it like this: how many points will Cleveland score?  Most &#8211; probably 10.  Do you think that Baltimore&#8217;s offense can put up 21 or more points?  Well then, load up.</p>
<p><strong>Season Total 19-18</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://beargoggleson.com/2009/11/13/barts-best-week-10-top-plays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bart&#8217;s Best &#8211; Week 6 Top Plays</title>
		<link>http://beargoggleson.com/2009/10/15/bart-best-week-6-top-plays/</link>
		<comments>http://beargoggleson.com/2009/10/15/bart-best-week-6-top-plays/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 02:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boomer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[against the spread]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Atlanta Falcons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Buffalo Bills]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carolina Panthers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chicago bears]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[detroit lions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Green Bay Packers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[New York Jets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tampa Bay Buccaneers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beargoggleson.com/?p=3325</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When &#8220;betting,&#8221; I don&#8217;t know which which is harder to deal with, winning early and then losing or losing first and then winning.  Either way, I ended up 2-2 last week, but I hate starting out positive (KC &#38; DEN) and then losing in the late games (NE &#38; NYJ). I&#8217;m still not a Denver [...]</p><p><a href="http://beargoggleson.com/2009/10/15/bart-best-week-6-top-plays/">Bart&#8217;s Best &#8211; Week 6 Top Plays</a> - <a href="http://beargoggleson.com">Bear Goggles On</a> - <a href="http://beargoggleson.com">Bear Goggles On - A Chicago Bears Fan Site - News, Blogs, Opinion and more.</a></p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When &#8220;betting,&#8221; I don&#8217;t know which which is harder to deal with, winning early and then losing or losing first and then winning.  Either way, I ended up 2-2 last week, but I hate starting out positive (<strong>KC </strong>&amp; <strong>DEN</strong>) and then losing in the late games (<strong>NE </strong>&amp; <strong>NYJ</strong>). I&#8217;m still not a <strong>Denver </strong>believer, I&#8217;m sorry. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I&#8217;m not a <strong>Kyle Orton</strong> hater. I liked him at Purdue and he did what he could do for the <strong>Bears</strong>. But seriously, New England, bring all of your defenders up within 15 yards of the line of scrimmage and you don&#8217;t have to cover past that. Kyle still can&#8217;t throw deep or on the run. Let me give you their playbook: slants, 5 and outs, 10 and outs, curls, screens.  Denver&#8217;s offense will nickel and dime you to death &#8211; which has worked for now, but as soon as a Defensive Coordinator figures it out, you won&#8217;t see those W&#8217;s stacking. Can you tell I&#8217;m a little angry about that one? On to WEEK 6: <a href="http://beargoggleson.com/2009/10/15/bart-best-week-6-top-plays/#more-3325" class="more-link">(more&#8230;)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://beargoggleson.com/2009/10/15/bart-best-week-6-top-plays/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Database Caching 13/22 queries in 0.041 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 471/536 objects using apc
Content Delivery Network via cdn.fansided.com

 Served from: beargoggleson.com @ 2013-05-24 15:40:29 by W3 Total Cache -->