Chicago Bears 2020 Roster Ranking: 12-11

Chicago Bears (Photo by Gregory Shamus/Getty Images)
Chicago Bears (Photo by Gregory Shamus/Getty Images) /
facebooktwitterreddit

Who are the 12th and 11th most valuable players on the 2020 Chicago Bears roster?

After adding David Montgomery as number 14, and Danny Trevathan as number 13, we are now onto the top 12 players on the Chicago Bears roster. We have counted down the entire roster from 90-13 and are into the most valuable players now.

So, who ranks 12th and 11th on the roster heading into 2020?

12. Charles Leno

Last Year: 10 

2018 Ranking: 17

Most fans do not like Charles Leno, but the value to the Chicago Bears is undebatable. As the left tackle, the Bears absolutely need him to come through and have a big season. While he did take a step back last year, and it shows in his ranking, the Bears are clearly still comfortable with him. They added names to the offensive line, but in the form of late-round picks and low-cost veterans. Also, while these additions have tackle ability, they are all likely to compete to start at guard.

The Bears essentially did nothing to add competition for Charles Leno. Expect another 16 games from Leno is a valuable role.

11. Anthony Miller

Last Year: 16 

2018 Ranking: 21

We have slowly crept Anthony Miller up the roster since being drafted in 2018. Now, it is time for him to prove his worth and get into the top ten for the 2021 rankings. Miller took huge strides forward to end his 2019 season. However, the start of the year was met with disappointment, miss-timings, and maturity questions.

Next. Comparing Anthony Miller to 2018 WR class. dark

We will get a firm vantage of what Anthony Miller really is this season. With Taylor Gabriel out of the picture and new tight ends up and down the roster, he is the firm number two and only real receiver with continuity. The Bears need him to show up as a true number threat to make life easier for Nick Foles and Mitch Trubisky. This puts a lot more on the table for Miller than in years past.